出版时间:2012-1 出版社:原子能出版社 作者:文都考研命题研究中心 编 页数:308
内容概要
从一九九六年至今,文都的研究生考试命题研究氛围愈加浓厚。发展到今天,精品图书层出不穷、一版再版。不断充实的每年春、秋两季图书征订目录,不仅为选择文都课程的莘莘学子获得高质量的学习成果提供了坚实的平台,而且在考研学子中树立了良好的口碑。我们在欣喜之余不敢有丝毫懈怠,文都考研命题研究中心经过长期的市场调查、精心的策划,特推出这本《考研英语历年真题精析——命题剖析与复习指导》。“授人以鱼不如授人以渔”,文都独家授课名师结合多年教学经验,在深入研究完形填空、阅读、阅读新题型、翻译和写作命题规律的基础上进行权威总结,提供科学的解题指导方法,对历年真题的每一道题目进行精准到位的解析。并且对全国得分偏低的题目进行特别解析和点拨,指导考生攻破难关从而取得考研英语科目的高分。
市场上已有不少考研英语历年真题解析方面的图书,其中也不乏严肃认真、有某种独到之处的作品,但很遗憾的是大多匆匆编成,错误太多,避重就轻,文字口语化,远达不到研究生考试这种高难度的水平考试应有的深度和严谨。
这本《考研英语历年真题精析——命题剖析与复习指导》在编写的过程中博采众长,力求为广大考研学子节省最宝贵的备考时间,提供最有力的帮助。日复一日,字斟句酌,力图做到寥寥数语,精准到位,使备考同学茅塞顿开、举一反三。所有努力体现在这本书的以下特点中。
书籍目录
2012年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2012年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2011年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2011年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2010年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2009年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2009年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2008年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2008年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2007年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2007年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2006年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2006年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2005年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2005年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2004年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2004年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
2003年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题
2003年全国硕士研究生入学考试英语试题答案与解析
附录:常用前缀和后缀
章节摘录
版权页: Text 4 On a five to three vote, the Supreme Court knocked out much of Arizona's immigration law Mondaya modest policy victory for the Obama Administration. But on the more important matter of the Constitution, the decision was an 8-0 defeat for the Administration's effort to upset the balance of power between the federal government and the states. In Arizona v. United States, the majority overturned three of the four contested provisions of Arizona's controversial plan to have state and local police enforce federal immigration law. The Constitutional principles that Washington alone has the power to "establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization" and that federal laws precede state laws are noncontroversial. Arizona had attempted to fashion state policies that ran parallel to the existing federal ones. Justice Anthony Kennedy, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and the Court's liberals, ruled that the state flew too close to the federal sun. On the overturned provisions the majority held the congress had deliberately "occupied the field" and Arizona had thus intruded on the federal's privileged powers. However, the Justices said that Arizona police would be allowed to verify the legal status of people who come in contact with law enforcement. That's because Congress has always envisioned joint federalstate immigration enforcement and explicitly encourages state officers to share information and cooperate with federal colleagues. Two of the three objecting Justice-Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas-agreed with this Constitutional logic but disagreed about which Arizona rules conflicted with the federal statute. The only major objection came from Justice Antonin Scalia, who offered an even more robust defense of state privileges going back to the alien and Sedition Acts. The 8-0 objection to President Obama turns on what Justice Samuel Alito describes in his objection as "a shocking assertion of federal executive power". The White House argued that Arizona's laws conflicted with its enforcement priorities, even if state Laws complied with federal statutes to the letter. In effect, the White House claimed that it could invalidate any otherwise legitimate state law that it disagrees with. Some powers do belong exclusively to the federal government, and control of citizenship and the borders is among them. But if Congress wanted to prevent states from using their own resources to check immigration status, it could. It never did so. The administration was in essence asserting that because it didn't want to carry out Congress's immigration wishes, no state should be allowed to do so either. Every Justice rightly rejected this remarkable claim.
编辑推荐
《2014考研英语历年真题精析:命题剖析与复习指导(英语1)》编辑推荐:定位解析十年考试真题,全面指导考研战略战。
图书封面
评论、评分、阅读与下载